Jeff
Milton
75 East
4th Street, Apt 3A
NYC, NY
10003
jm@waena.edu
(917)
533-5847
Last
updated: Nov 13, 2005
A
father's desperate and final plea
This
entire document is available online at
http://www.waena.edu/fathersfight/html/my_case.html
I
am in desperate need of legal aid, as much as NY State is in
desperate need of Family Court reform. If you are receiving this
letter, it is because I am hoping you can help with legal
advice, exposure
or to simply make you aware
of the plight of thousands of fathers who are suffering from the
draconian ways of this most unjust system. Lives are ruined, both
the fathers and the children's. Families are destroyed. Civil
rights annihilated. I could not have believed such systemic blind
persecution and prejudice could exist in this country without having
experienced it first hand. It is even harder to believe that nothing
is being done about it by politicians or lawyers.
The Problem
I have been paying
Ulster County Child Support (UCCS) on time for over 5 years, yet New
York Family Court/Child Support has taken all my money, closed all my
financial accounts, suspended my license, threatened to throw me
jail, denied me due process, destroyed my credit, harassed me,
blatantly lied to me and threatened me.
I have actually received phone calls from Ms. T. of UCCS asking me to
give more money than the court ordered (which was already 19%
above standard) or face the threat of being dragged back into court,
where, she assured me, they would win. They have condoned
perjury and abuse on my ex's
part and gross incompetence
on the part of the public defender. They have used privileged
information between my lawyer and myself against me and denied my
objection based on not only his violation of privilege,
but that his damaging statement was incorrect. They have punished me
for not moving 3,000 miles away to get a job, forcing me to
abandon my children. Child
Welfare has ignored my complaints.
My petitions are scheduled up to four months ahead, while Patricia's
are scheduled three weeks ahead. UCCS (Ms. T.) has told me they do
not need to recognize any court order of agreement between my ex and
myself, and they will continue to take everything I own
until I am homeless and destitute.
I am not asking to
get out of my payments. I am only asking for fair and impartial
treatment. Specifically...
The Ulster Country Child Support Department
recognizes the thousands of dollars of real estate and property I
gave my ex in an act of good will after we separated, even if
they don't receive any federal 'incentives' for it. Although
I signed over my ownership to avoid a foreclosure (I was lead to
believe by Patricia and her relatives), it is becoming clear that I
was naive and the threat to my children was used as a ploy to
conspire to get ownership of the property.
Unless justified otherwise, fair monthly
support money will be sent to the children directly without going
through any child support department. Prior to my ex's demand
that I pay through the state I had not been late with a single
payment. She was pushed by Child Support to do this, perhaps for no
other reason then for them to realize more federal 'incentives'.
Once I started paying the state, the check were late and the state
submitted damaging credit reports against me for checks they were
late in processing.
The Ulster Country Child Support Department
repairs the damage it caused to my credit.
The Ulster Country Child Support Department
considers unemployment to be a valid reason for downward
modification of $5,000/mo payments AND they can not punish me for
not moving away from my children to find work. In other words,
they should act like they are considering what's in the best
interest of the children, and not just say it to justify their
current practices.
The Ulster Country Child Support Department
reimburses or credits me for the hundreds of dollars in bank
penalties as a direct consequence of closing by business (and only)
account. I have a court order that details how I am to pay off
the back debt and I am in complete compliance with that order.
Since there is a court order in effect it is unreasonable for the
state to seize all me assets.
The Ulster
Country Child Support Department allow me to request an accounting
of how the Child Support money is being spent (because it
is not being spent on the children)
The
morning of December 8th, 2005, I go before a Family Court
Support Magistrate for a violation of a child support order because
after all my money was taken I had none to send.
By the afternoon there is a good chance I will be in Debtors Prison.
I have been threatened with incarceration before by Family
Court for the crime of being unemployed, not for not paying
support.
I do not want to be or
deserve to be thrown in jail, but if I am, I will not cede. I will
not allow this tyranny to continue. They have taken everything I had
to loose, and if I am jailed, my children, who are being held hostage
by their mother and the courts as they survive on my CS payments,
will also loose. I will go to jail as a proud protester and join the
ranks of Danial Chang, John Murtari, and other Father's Right
activists who have suffered the most egregious abuse of civil rights
since the advent of slavery.
The Cast of
Characters
Jeff
Milton: The
respondent/defendant, me. Resides in New York City
Patricia
N.: The petitioner, my ex-wife.
Resides in Ulster Country with out three children
John
Beisel: The Ulster County
child support hearing examiner
Douglas
W.: Ulster County Public
defender, who 'defense' was used against me by the judge
Ms. T.:
Ulster Country child support collection unit worker who threatened me
with personal phone calls wanting more money above and beyond the
court order
Marianne
Mizel: Ulster Country Custody
judge
Colette
V.: Patricia's attorney, and District Attorney (I'm told) who
lied through her teeth to me on more then one occasion
Below
is a brief historical account. It does not include many instances of
state sanctioned harassment, threats, incompetence, rights abuse,
physical abuse, favoritism, sexism, prejudice and perjury (not mine).
Historical
Account
My wife (Patricia) and
I separated about 6 years ago. At that time we had three children,
ages 7, 9 and 10. I earned $130,000 that year, and only that year.
During the course of our 25 year marriage my income averaged
approximately $35,000/yr, which is what one might expect from someone
like myself who never graduated high school. But for two brief years
during the DotCom boom I did earn that. When we separated, the
family court magistrate concluded that because I made that much money
that year, this was my earning potential regardless of any other
economic or market variables.
In order to bolster her
case (at the suggestion of her new attorney) Patricia filed for an
order of protection based completely on perjured testimony. The case
was dismissed due to lack of evidence, but I was denied visitation
for many months as a result.
Based on my income for
that year, according to the Child Support Standards Chart for New
York State, I would have to pay approx. $34,000 a year in child
support. Even tough that was a lot of money, I was even more
concerned that my ex and the children would have a hard time
adjusting to a new life, so I made an agreement with her Lawyer to
pay $53,136 a year
($19,000 above the Standard), but for only two years, at which point
it would drop to the Standard amount. At least that is was I lead to
believe by Patricia's lawyer, Colette V., who was also the District
Attorney (I was told) for that same court system. Specifically, she
told me “You can change this agreement whenever you like”.
OK, I was stupid for believing her, but I was new at this and
thought I was doing the right thing... and she was really good at
deceiving me... I was no match.
I did not have a lawyer. I could not afford a lawyer because I was
giving all my money to Patricia... money she used to hire a lawyer!
And I was not eligible for legal aid as I made too much money, even
though after 40% taxes and 50% CS I was taking home around 10% of my
paycheck.
When I learned that I
had been duped, and that the $4,500 payments could not be changed
(barring a change in circumstance, which also turns out to be a lie)
I filed an objection.
Unfortunately, being
new at all this, I was 75 days past the 30 day limit. The objection
was denied.
While I was employed I
continued to pay the child support and maintenance. Then I was laid
off... as were thousands of others who worked in the Internet
industry.
Having zero savings, I
could not continue to pay $4,500/mo. I applied for unemployment and
a downward modification of CS due to 'change in circumstance' .
Weeks went by and still no check arrived. When I called
unemployment they informed me that I had been receiving checks for
four weeks already, but that they had been garnishing 100% of my
unemployment check and sending it to the state. In addition my
arrears were building up at a rate of $700/wk. I was assigned a
court hearing date of Sept. 12, months away. The events of 9/11 were
traumatic, especially if you lived 25 blocks from the World Trade
Center and behind the armed military blockade that was immediately
set up. I requested an adjournment via fax, as I was instructed to
do. There was never a reply. Through great difficulty and expense I
managed to arrive at the courthouse 120 miles away, where I was
informed that my hearing had indeed been canceled. When I asked why
I was not informed, they told me they don't make phone calls, they
only mail. So my hearing was reschedule. After 5 months from when I
became unemployed I was before a judge asking for downward
modification. The whole time 100% of my unemployment check was being
garnished.
The judge did not
consider the thousands of resumes I had sent out, the dozens of
rejection letters I produced, the dramatic downturn in the Internet
industry. My incomprehensibly incompetent public defender made my
case even worse when he misquoted me to the judge stating I had a job
offer in California. What I had said to him in private was that I
had a job interview in California, but would not consider it as it
would take me away from my children.
Knowing how slow the
courts take to act, I waited months for a judgment. Finally,
complaining to my assigned lawyer I discovered that a judgment HAD
been issued... months earlier! I immediately submitted an objection
to the denial for relief, but was told I had exceeded the time period
for objections. When I complained that the court never sent me any
judgment, they told me they were only required to send it to my
lawyer... and if the lawyer make a mistake it is not the courts
fault. Nevertheless, I submitted two objections, both denied
,,
, both ignored.
I was now officially a
‘dead-beat dad’ because I owed Patricia $15,541 in back
child support, and was summoned to court on July 20, 2004.
As a show of good will, I signed over my half of the house to her so
she could move it into her fathers name. I was lead to believe she
would exonerate me from this debt, but, she did not (again, I was
stupid).
My request was denied
on the grounds that
I was not willing
to move 3,000 miles away from my children and
I had a comedy
website (http://angrybaldmengonewild.com)
that COULD bring in income. (Unfortunately, the court did not
explain HOW I could bring in this money from a website that charged
nothing and sold nothing.)
because I made a
website advertising my consulting services the court concluded I was
not committed to getting a steady job.
because I only
looked for jobs in my area of expertise I was limiting my ability to
find other work. How they expected me to earn enough money to pay
$4,500/mo in a field I had no experience in remains a mystery.
In addition, because I
had agreed to pay for health costs and provide health insurance, but
did not spell out in detail that Patricia was required to use doctors
that a) accepted insurance, and, b) under my coverage, I was sued for
health care expenses of $1,353 to cover the costs of homeopaths,
chiropractors and doctors that were not in my health insurance plan,
and was ordered to purchase health insurance that Patricia approved
of. I objected. The objection was denied.
I paid in full. (Meizel's later decision stated that I was
obligated to provide insurance in Saugerties, regardless of what my
company provided - which was health care providers 40 minutes away -
which meant the courts expected me to spend an additional $1,200/mo
for independent health care for the children because their mother did
not want to drive 40 minutes)
Given the support
amount I owed weekly combined with taxes, I would have had to make
over $73,000 a year for her to get the same amount of money as she
was receiving from my unemployment. I could not find a job over
$73,000, so I opted to remain on unemployment for the benefit of her
and the children.
All this while I kept
certifying my unemployment claims, but as I received nothing from the
state as it all went to Patricia, I was not aware of the fact that
the unemployment checks had stopped coming. I was informed by
Patricia two months later that the checks had stopped coming. I
immediately wrote to the unemployment office. I received to reply.
I called the unemployment office, and was told my account had been
closed... yet I was able to still certify my claims over the
Internet? The person I spoke to could not account for this, but did
not think it was that odd.
Because of the above
evidence combined with the lack of checks I was threatened with jail
if I did not find a job, but ultimately found not to be willfully
negligent.
I objected. My
objection was denied [see
for Judge Meizel's elaboration on decisions of objections]
Being a “dead-beat
dad”, the state suspended my license and froze all my assets
except for my bank account (various stock and investment accounts
which had been emptied years before by Patricia and myself). I was
now unable to see my children. The entire summer I was unable to see
my children.
I objected
on the grounds that suspending my license made it even more difficult
to find work and that it denied me the court appointed right to see
my children(especially as the court determined that I must drive to
them)
The judge warned me
that if I did not find a job I would be put in jail. I borrowed some
money from a friend and took a course in legal proofreading. I
decided to work for a law firm specifically to have access to legal
research that I was sure I would be needing in the court battles
that would soon follow, and being 'pro se' I had better learn
something about the law.
I got a job at
Debevoise & Plimpton for $50,000 a year as a legal temp, one of
the largest law firms in New York. I petitioned for modification.
I filed an objection to the License Suspension
Upon learning that I was working for Debevoise & Plimpton, the
magistrate returned my license and modified my payments.
Since that time I have
complied 100% with the order. Four months ago I became unemployed
again, and the state has been taking their money from my unemployment
check (leaving me $45/wk)
On October 17, 2005 my
bank account was 'restrained' leaving me with a -$46,628.61 balance
(and hundreds of dollars in finance fees).
I sent a copy of the existing order with an objection
to Magistrate Beisel, UCCS and my attorney, Douglas W.. None of them
have yet to reply.
I also called Child
Support Collection (Ms T.), and she assured me they could and would
come after anything I owned regardless of any court order, and that
it is their practice to double the amount owed.
On December 8th,
2005, I appear in Family Court in Kingston, NY.